Krisztián Papp
Krisztián Papp Krisztián is a principal engineer at Diligent with over a decade of hands-on experience in creating and maintaining software. He is the founder of the Letscode.hu community, creating a supportive environment where individuals can thrive, share their knowledge, and collectively contribute to the advancement of technology.

Keep up the PACE

Keep up the PACE

Software architecture isn’t a one-time decision—it’s a living, evolving part of your system. Yet, many teams struggle with extremes: too much rigidity (where architecture slows everything down) or too much chaos (where no one thinks about architecture until problems explode).

Well, not anymore! Let me introduce you to PACE.

PACE—Pragmatic Architecture & Continuous Evaluation—gives you a structured yet lightweight way to keep architecture aligned with business goals, technical realities, and evolving constraints.


Why Should You Care About PACE?

Traditional approaches assume:

  • Architecture is set upfront and remains mostly static.
  • Reviews happen only at major milestones or when things break.
  • A few experts (architects, tech leads) make the decisions.

But in today’s fast-moving world, software needs agility, adaptability, and alignment with real-world conditions. If architecture is ignored, you risk technical debt, misalignment, and scaling nightmares. If it’s too rigid, your team will struggle to deliver value efficiently. PACE helps you avoid both pitfalls.


The Four Pillars of PACE

1. Pragmatic Architecture

  • Be intentional but flexible—avoid over-engineering.
  • Design for what’s needed now and what’s likely next, without locking yourself in.
  • Favor reversible decisions where possible.

2. Continuous Evaluation

  • Architecture isn’t a one-time thing—it needs regular check-ins.
  • Set up lightweight, frequent reviews instead of waiting for big redesigns.
  • Use real-world data (performance metrics, observability, team feedback) to adjust course.

3. Collaboration Over Control

  • Architecture isn’t just the architect’s job—it’s everyone’s responsibility.
  • Encourage input from developers, ops, product managers, and architects.
  • Use decision records (ADRs) to document and share architectural choices transparently.

4. Embedded Feedback Loops

  • Integrate architecture checks into CI/CD, not just during audits.
  • Automate dependency analysis, architectural linting, and runtime monitoring.
  • Treat architecture like code—continuously reviewed and improved.

How to Apply PACE in Your Team

  1. Start Small – Add quick architecture check-ins to retrospectives or planning meetings.
  2. Use ADRs – Keep track of architectural decisions in a simple, accessible format.
  3. Monitor Key Metrics – Watch for performance issues, maintainability concerns, and architectural drift.
  4. Visualize & Validate – Use tools like Structurizr, ArchUnit, or dependency graphs to keep architecture clear.
  5. Make Learning a Habit – Discuss architecture trade-offs in team forums and design reviews.

Final Thoughts

By keeping up the PACE, you ensure your architecture stays relevant, resilient, and responsive—without adding unnecessary overhead.

Instead of treating architecture as an occasional concern, PACE makes it an ongoing practice. This means fewer surprises, better decisions, and a system that evolves gracefully.

Don’t let architecture be a bottleneck or an afterthought—make it a strategic enabler with PACE.

More to come—stay tuned for concrete examples and practical ways to apply PACE in real-world projects!

comments powered by Disqus